Annotated Bibliography

I just need you to answer the following questions

1) What was the biggest hurdle when it came to the Annotated Bibliography?

  • How did you overcome that obstacle?
  • What do you feel like you accomplished with the Annotated Bibliography?

2) What did you argue about in your Classical Argument?

  • Why did you choose that topic?
  • Did your perspective about the topic change at all?
  • Why/why not?

3) What is the difference between the Classical Argument and the Rogerian Argument?

  • What was the common ground between both sides?
  • Did the common ground change the way you looked at the overall debate
  • Did it have any effect on your solution?

4) What did you take away from the Toulmin Argument?

  • What did categorizing do for you as a student?
  • Do you feel like you examine arguments differently now?
  • Why/Why not?